Goals of the Community Alliance for Positive Solutions Inc. (CAPS):

CAPS propose that:

The Plan:

In 2001/02 Alcoa introduced plans to build its third unit in Wagerup, at the cost of approximately $900 million. This unit was designed to produce around two million tonnes of alumina per year, increasing Alcoa's production at Wagerup to over 5.25 million tonnes per annum. The upgrade was delayed by the Government due to the on-going health and environmental concerns of the communities surrounding Wagerup Refinery.

In early 2004, Alain Belda, Alcoa's CEO, visited Western Australia, and in particular, the W.A. Government, and stated that if Alcoa is not allowed to upgrade the Wagerup Refinery to three units at a cost of $1.4 billion, Alcoa will take their money elsewhere. Also around this time, CAPS released a survey to the communities located between Waroona and Harvey. Fourteen percent of the surveys were returned, and the results indicated, among other things, that the majority of respondents felt the refinery will continue to grow irrespective of the communities' concerns and 75% felt the Land Management Proposal is unfair (see attachment).

We must state at this time that Alcoa has always maintained that there is NO problem with the Wagerup Refinery, either from the noise or odours emitted from this refinery or mud lakes, and they have maintained this stance since 1996. They have repeatedly requested community input on these matters when concerns have arisen, yet have never collaborated with the community to create any tangible solutions, nor have they been open and transparent in their agenda.

Within a week of the survey being released, CAPS member Merv McDonald was invited to meet with Bill Knight, the manager of Wagerup refinery, at his office. During this meeting, certain items were discussed: the survey/questionnaire, which Alcoa considered to be biased; why the survey was sent out, and at whose request; and, as Mr Knight stated, that Alcoa was going to build a third unit at Wagerup 2004/05.

At the first meeting, Mr Knight mentioned that he knew Vince Puccio's (CAPS) ongoing focus has been to relocate the Town of Yarloop. Merv stated that if Alcoa looked at the logic and overall consequences of what Vince was stating, they may find it to their benefit. Both Vince and Merv have never stated or intended a desire to close or reduce Alcoa's production at Wagerup. The intention of CAPS is to create a win/win situation for ALL (communities, Alcoa, shires, government).

Both Alcoa and the impacted communities can benefit from the CAPS plan in several ways:

The New Town

Why is this a good plan?

- The CSIRO study could be implemented ASAP. Then new state-of-the-art technologies can be created and included in expansion plans, benefiting Alcoa through new patents, saving money by not having to retrofit at later date, and being recognised as a world leader in community and environmental care.

- The community wins with the creation of a new town. Residents can start new life. All residents in impacted communities have a choice to move or stay and keep similar lifestyle, with compensation.

- The government wins by being recognised for its strong leadership, working closely with the community and Alcoa to support win/win situation.

- The shire benefits by the creation of a new town.



this site powered by : linux apache php mysql

email the site administrator

Site Design and Code by Brett Dell strum@softhome.net 2007